Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of development estimation software Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_development_estimation_software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of development estimation software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Original reasoning was Not need only three notable software items. See also link is sufficient.. Article also has no sources and so qualifies as WP:OR.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 03:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This article is important in my opinion, it covers software which are hard to compare for non-professionals, The validity of this article is the same as existing software articles:

http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_project_management_software http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_web_server_software http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_screencasting_software http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comparison_of_revision_control_software and many other articles Franklin90210 (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Only 1 entry in this list now has its own article.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 04:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This looks like unsourced OR to me. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.