Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of International Property Ownership Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_International_Property_Ownership

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of International Property Ownership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this is perhaps a worthy topic, I question the validity of the article as currently established, particularly as the rationale for removing the PROD was that the original author requires time to update it. It's more sourced now than when I initially saw it (where it was almost entirely unsourced and largely empty a month or so after creation), but at best this is a Draft created in mainspace too early. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Highly original organization of information, almost all of which is lacking. And I mean "original" in a NOR sort of way... Carrite (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this is incomplete and mostly presents trivial data. I would recommend separate pages like Land ownership in Canada if anyone ever wants to re-create this. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Carrite. ^{Atsme📞📧} 23:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as highly trivial and incomplete list. More like an abandoned project. Ajf773 (talk) 08:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.