Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Exchange ActiveSync clients Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_Exchange_ActiveSync_clients

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Exchange ActiveSync clients

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIR, despite contested PROD. A talk page comment dating from December 2016 claims that the page is also outdated, and perhaps parts of it still are. High pageview count does not necessarily prove notability or encyclopedicity. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTGUIDE. Outdated content and not encyclopedic. Ajf773 (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.