Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_Criteria_Evaluation_and_Validation_Scheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV in non-WP:PRIMARY or coverage that is not WP:PASSING. Longhornsg (talk) 06:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Military, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 06:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - sourced entirely by a single. Bearian (talk) 16:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.