Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comdata Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comdata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comdata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP/WP:ORGCRIT and the broader WP:GNG. The article is sourced to only two items:

• a one‑paragraph Bloomberg wire about Ceridian’s 1995 purchase (reprinted in *The New York Times*) – routine transaction coverage; and
• Fleetcor’s own 2014 investor news release announcing its $3.45 billion acquisition – a primary, self‑published source.

Database searches (Factiva/Lexis/Google News) locate nothing more substantial than brief Reuters market notes on the 2014 deal and similar M&A rumours – all explicitly WP:ROUTINE business disclosures lacking the in‑depth, independent, secondary analysis required by policy. No major newspaper, magazine, journal, or book offers sustained coverage of the company itself. AndesExplorer (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Technology, and United States of America. AndesExplorer (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Tennessee. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.