Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonization on Earth Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Colonization_on_Earth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colonization on Earth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't add anything to Colonization. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete – I don't think this is necessarily content that should be placed into an article. On the other hand, I believe a category could be established instead. --Tuxipedia (talk) 02:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 01:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Adequately covered by the article Colonization and the category "colonialism". Zero^talk 02:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding. If the decision is made to keep this, the silly title really must be changed. It reads like something out of a C-grade sci-fi film. Zero^talk 05:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a WP:list of lists, this is a contentless navigation aid, perfectly acceptable under policy. Jclemens (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rather than a list article for navigation, a navbox or category would be more appropriate. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.