Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cognitive_Reliability_and_Error_Analysis_Method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article only provides generic sourcing from initial edits in 2008. Massive copyvio of https://www.davidpublisher.org/Public/uploads/Contribute/5837fd04c28cb.pdf, http://www.iracst.org/ijrmt/papers/Vol2no12012/5vol2no1.pdf and possibly original papers describing the method. General notability not asserted in article. Also WP:NOTMANUAL.

Either nuke the article per WP:TNT or do a complete rewrite to summarize the method and its relations with other articles covering the field of safety analysis. — JFG ^talk 07:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the hell out of it. CREAM is only one variant of Human reliability analysis, and not any more notable than many others. None of these methods has been proved to be better than the others, just more acceptable to engineers and designers. Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Famous_dog (c) 07:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete artricle. See Hollnagel's own disclaimer form 2012 on ^[1] Rjdeboer29 (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC) rjdeboer29[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.