Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codeless test automation Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Codeless_test_automation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Codeless test automation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be only used for promotional purposes. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete the phrase is one that means something, but this is at best a DICDEF with a promotional cite to a non-RS. Maybe redirect to Test automation - David Gerard (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should have been a speedy delete. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unreliably cited essay. I would have requested a speedy deletion, but can't seem to find a suitable category. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.