Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codejock Software Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Codejock_Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Codejock Software

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't seem to be anything notable about the company. The only citations are about awards it has won and a local newspaper article about the couple who founded it. Also, it's mainly been edited by single user, who has only edited this article. So its obviously promotional. Adamant1 (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no credible sources could be found, all sources from promotional websites. Evidently a promotional article. WikiAviator (talk) 06:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2 gnews hits as press releases says it all. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.