Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coalescing (computer science) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Coalescing_(computer_science)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Memory management. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coalescing (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not really important enough to merit a full article. It should probably be merged but I don't know to where. CodeCat (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Memory management. Cusop Dingle (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Can be merged somewhere (altough I don't see a pressing need to do so), but than can be discussed on the talk page. —Ruud 20:16, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 26. Snotbot  t • c »  20:16, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and merge to Memory management. No reason given for deletion by nom. --Kvng (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I think there's room to develop this topic as an encyclopedic article. The term has broader use in computer science than just memory management, so it should not be merged there. It can refer to coalescing anything. For example, in a compiler, it can refer to coalescing operations, e.g., as described here. Msnicki (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. and expand/fix. It will just get buried in MemManagement. History2007 (talk) 18:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.