Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema Craft Encoder Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cinema_Craft_Encoder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema Craft Encoder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not asserted. All references are from the company itself and a google search does not find any independent reviews and/or articles on the software (note, I was the IP that placed the AFD tag on the page) Muthian (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands - it's plausible it's actually important and noteworthy, but we'd need the sources - David Gerard (talk) 08:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - all I found outside download sites and primary is [1], and it probably is not reliable. Note also the sentence Currently under development, a 4K UHD Blu-ray encoder will release in 2015, which does not really prove anything (if the other parts of the software are notable, maybe such a mention were warranted at the time) but gives me an occasion to advertise Template:As of. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.