Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Clark (programmer) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Clark_(programmer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Clark (programmer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's userpage as it appears to be WP:FAKEARTICLE. DrStrauss talk 12:06, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note See comments by subject on the talk page of this AFD — Train2104 (t • c) 17:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: In response to the point above, please refer to the Works section and References list in the article in question for evidence demonstrating notable academic contributions through multiple published and reliable sources. Please also note that I edited the article in question and am not Christopher Clark. Status418 (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 07:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 18:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC as all sources are trivial. Quasar G ^{t - c} 20:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I received my PhD in computer science in 2009. I referred to Christopher Clark's work at multiple places in my dissertation Measuring and extending LR(1) parser generation: 1) Page v, Acknowledgement; 2) Page 16, "Chris Clark worked on the LALR(k)/LR(1)/LR(k) parser generator Yacc++"; 3) Page 170, "Chris Clark also mentioned one type of grammar that he calls the LR(closed) grammar [4]"; 4) Page 170, "Figure 6.10: The part of Chris Clark’s grammar’s parsing machine related to reduce/reduce conflicts"; 5) Page 212, reference "[4] LR(closed) grammars"; 6) Page 213, reference "[23] Chris Clark. Yacc++ historical notes". 19:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As said above, the relevant guidelines are WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC, which are not met. Citations in one's thesis are irrelevant. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 12:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:NACADEMIC and WP:AUTOBIO. Support blanking User:Christopher.f.clark as an inappropriate use of userspace; Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service for people to put up their autobiographies. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.