Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chora (Programming Language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chora_(Programming_Language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chora (Programming Language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no assertion of notability Ironholds (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - "No assertion of notability" is only a deletion reason if you're arguing for a A7 speedy delete. CSD A7 doesn't apply to software. The general notability guidelines that you link to don't require notability to be asserted, merely that notability could potentially be established through significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Should we take the nomination to mean that you searched for and were unable to find such sources, and therefore believe the article fails WP:N? - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially, yes. My apologies for the miswording. Ironholds (talk) 06:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Great. With that clarification, I'm unable to find any significant coverage for this programming language (much to my surprise) and so therefore must agree that it fails WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.