Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartered Systems Integration Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chartered_Systems_Integration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chartered Systems Integration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company lacks significant secondary coverage as required under WP:GNG and also lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. No significant secondary-source coverage could be found in a search. Additionally I have doubts about the claims under the "awards" section: the company is said to have won Microsoft Developer Partner of the Year in 2008 and 2009 and was a runner-up in another category those same years. This listing of 2008 winners from Microsoft makes no mention of the company. I could be looking at the wrong set of awards, but I think this still fails the normal notability test. Batard0 (talk) 10:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - After an extensive search with both Google News Zimbabwe and US and searching with terms "Zimbabwe", "2007" and "company", I found one but minor result. However, when I started searching with "1st Runner-Up ICT Company of the Year 2011", I found this and this which also supports the "Top Web Developer of the Year" claim. At the second link, one of the comments by a "Mukuru Mukuru" (obviously affiliated with the company) claims the company won "Microsoft Developer Partner of the Year 2008/2009" but, of course, citing a user's comment would be unreliable. Aside from the two links I found above, the other information seems to be supported by the company's claims therefore primary. It is possible that additional sources may not be English, but I doubt it, African countries and companies will use English to conduct business, especially with technology. SwisterTwister talk 23:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.