Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charge polarization Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charge_polarization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. deleted by Timotheus Canens per ANI discussion. (procedural close) —SpacemanSpiff 07:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charge polarization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonsense article, possibly with OR. Individual sentences can be parsed as English, but taken together, the article is gibberish. References are only here for padding, it looks like. Editor who created this page, User:Marshallsumter is currently banned for disruptive editing. Hundreds of other articles from this editor are being canvassed. Please help! AstroCog (talk) 23:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There is a tiny amount of sense in bits of the article but not to overcome OSYN. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Unlike most of this user's articles, the references actually back up some individual points within the text, but the core of it is still OR and SYNTH violations. Trusilver 14:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. As far as I am able to tell, the parts that Xxanthippe refers to as making "a tiny bit of sense" were copied word-for-word (without attribution) from other Wikipedia articles (technically a violation of the terms of our license). Sławomir Biały (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.