Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial gamma-ray source Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Celestial_gamma-ray_source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. deleted by Timotheus Canens per ANI discussion. (procedural close) —SpacemanSpiff 07:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial gamma-ray source

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonsense article, possibly with OR. Individual sentences can be parsed as English, but taken together, the article is gibberish. References are only here for padding, it looks like. Editor who created this page, User:Marshallsumter is currently banned for disruptive editing. Hundreds of other articles from this editor are being canvassed. Please help! AstroCog (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball delete. Note that User:Marshallsumter has created a whole sub-wikipedia of bad articles that link abundantly to each other, like Astronomical source ad Astronomical object. What the heck? Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 01:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; it's not a coherent article on the subject, it's just a bunch of unrelated phrases that are jumbled together. bobrayner (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Carcharoth (talk) 03:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.