Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calculating 82041 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Calculating_82041

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy A1 UtherSRG (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calculating 82041

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completion of incomplete nomination. Should have been tagged {{db-nocontext}}, however I am bringing it here on behalf of another editor. Speedy delete A1. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notable page. Keep it!--205.215.88.178 (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense. Falcon8765 (talk) 19:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
not nonsense. it is a calculation of wavelengths in pulsars--205.215.88.178 (talk) 19:32, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A1. Unless this is a documented easter-egg or something, it's not even worth mentioning in the main Python article. Ezhuks (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
it is about a nuance involving pulsars!--205.215.88.178 (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.