Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C Sharp in Depth Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/C_Sharp_in_Depth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C Sharp in Depth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book of debatable notability. Spherical Cassowary (talk) 03:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cant see why this book is notable. Cinadon36 04:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looks like a nice, interesting and entirely non-notable book. Horrible article, shameless promotion (inline external links). If there are other book reviews (I mean real reviews), feel free to mention them and I will change my mind. Pavlor (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a totally non-notable manual on using a particular programming language.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.