Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffer space (software development) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Buffer_space_(software_development)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buffer space (software development) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the software development context, this appears to be a little-used neologism. The article provides no references and I was unable to find online references using the term "buffer space" with this meaning. Pichpich (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: the article should be deleted as misleading and completely unreferenced. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I haven't heard this terminology before. The article is unreferenced. A web search doesn't immediately turn up anything. Buffer space is a pretty overloaded term so we can't expect too much from a web search. I don't see any mention of buffer in Executable or Object file. I'm dubious. As far as redirect targets, doesn't look like Data buffer is a good choice. I think deleting may be the best way forward. ~Kvng (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as my searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 08:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.