Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog Torrent Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blog_Torrent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash^talk 00:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was speedied and reversed by DRV. For some reason. -Splash^talk 23:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• keep please it is very popular and 185,000 hits on google [1] Yuckfoo 23:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a non-notable program. --InShaneee 23:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is sufficiently notable. --Ezeu 00:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable software that is commonly used. JoshuaZ 00:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. Notable, popular software. Rob T Firefly 02:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but article is in dire need of expansion. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notably innovative. Ashibaka tock 17:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• comment Can anyone point me to a reliable source for the claim that it is innovative? Just zis Guy you know? 23:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not-notable blog shit. incog 21:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete war on blogcruft 213.106.152.192 21:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.