Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomorphic robotics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Biomorphic_robotics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biomorphic_robotics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

very poor writing, no sources, refimprove tag 7 years old Pcwendland (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete only significant references I could find was in the context of old ads for an Xmas toy and the title of a single book. This appears to be a term that did not 'catch on'.Pincrete (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless it can be improved as though I'm not at all familiar with this, my searches found no good sources aside from this (nothing much outstanding as it is). SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.