Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic Averages Game Simulation Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Basic_Averages_Game_Simulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Averages Game Simulation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significant Copy/Paste from programming forum that asserts a incompatible copyright licence to WP. Single reference seems to be only way to assert it's notability, but is under a week old and a novel concept. Fails WP:GNG,~~WP:CRYSTAL~~,WP:MADEUP. Could potentially qualify for a CSD:G12 (of the single reference) but because there was enough differences and paraphrasing I did not feel that this was an unequivical case. Hasteur (talk) 05:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In what way CRYSTAL? Anarchangel (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've striked CRYSTAL because there's no "It could be big in the future" assertions Hasteur (talk) 12:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copyright and tone issues. Nothing indicates this term is used anywhere, or that it's ideas are notable. Possible speedy delete due to copyright. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 17:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.