Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMG Labtech Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/BMG_Labtech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BMG Labtech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any coverage in RS, only a multitude of press releases. SmartSE (talk) 12:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: They may have a novel assay, and it could be that searches would show that the particular assay will be notable at some point, but the company has not generated enough discussion to pass GNG yet. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.