Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avant-garde architecture Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Avant-garde_architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avant-garde architecture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that I'm not sure what to make of it-its basically a list of articles saying see this-not a list really or a DAB either. Wgolf (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No doubt an article could be written on the subject, but this is just a disjointed grab bag of links and nothing else. Looks better now. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-looks like a COI as the creator also made Patrik Schumacher and Parametricism which the 2nd one of the contributors has the same name as Patrik Schumacher. wanted to point that out really quick. Wgolf (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic seems easy to develop and expand from sources such as the Encyclopedia of Twentieth Century Architecture. I have made a start per our editing policy. Deletion would disrupt such work. See also WP:CONCEPTDAB, which provides a sensible framework for a broad summary which is appropriate here. Andrew D. (talk) 11:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Andrew Davidson.--Ipigott (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article has improved compared to the beginning. SwisterTwister talk 17:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.