mic_none

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associative engine Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Associative_engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  05:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Associative engine

[edit]
Associative engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3 sentence stub with no references on > 3 years. There are lots of google hits for this term, but many seem to be unrelated to the CAD/solid modeling software discussed in the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 00:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The only CAD-related hits I see are two patents that are being returned by Google Scholar (but not Google Patent Search, oddly) and this is not sufficient to demonstrate notability. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 03:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, and also delete the transmigration operation redirect it contains, which was merged to a real article and is now extinct there. No prejudice to recreation of either with RS, but there's nothing to keep in either history. JJB 05:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.