Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aion Network Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aion_Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aion Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not notable, the subject fails WP:NCORP. Most of the existing references are to primary sources. The article itself is also badly advertorial. R2d232h2 (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I added a number of sources that bring the topic past WP:GNG, arguably, but I'm less convinced they help prove WP:CORPDEPTH is met. Maybe? A merge to a related bitcoin topic might also be an option. 66.198.222.67 (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's the parent company Nuco but it's also tagged for notability. Џ 06:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The nominator is a blocked sock puppet but I request that this AfD not be closed early because of that. The article was tagged for notability in November by a different editor. Џ 06:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seconded - David Gerard (talk) 11:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it stands - sources are primary and crypto blogs, even after additional work during this AFD - David Gerard (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This article was clearly written by someone trying to advertise it. If stripped down to the few legitimate sources, it would never pass AfC. Dr-Bracket (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: an apparent sockpuppet nom, but the subject does not meet the relevant notability guidelines and is cryptocurrency 'cruft. Might as well delete as the page ended up here. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.