Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agena (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Agena_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Vacated. Bad faith nomination by indefblocked user.. causa sui (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agena (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion No notable references, no info on web. Clearly just a personal hobbyist project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs)

• Note - This AFD was malformed. It was made as a second nomination where there was no previous. I have moved it to its current location. There was no listing in the AFD list for July 26. I have added it. The AFD discussion did not have the standard AFD template material. I have added it in. Note that the nominator is the author of Fly (programming language) which is under consideration for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly (programming language). -- Whpq (talk) 15:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Isn't notable per WP:N, because it lacks any independent sources. The only reference I can find that isn't by the authors page or related to the author is the following: http://rosettacode.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Agena . I personally don't think that counts as enough sources. The author also seems to have edited the page many times. snaphat (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - The nominator does appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior. snaphat (talk) 21:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doesn't matter, since it doesn't meet WP:N Flylanguage (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability; cannot find any independent sources. -- 202.124.75.176 (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.