Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Query Tool Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Advanced_Query_Tool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Query Tool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, unsourced article about non-notable software. MER-C 19:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - 1) Promotional, then everything on this "Comparison of database tools" list should be considered promotional, including the freeware that YOU haven't marked for deletion. 2) AQT home page says "since 1999 with tens of thousands of licenses sold in over 70 countries", which sounds more notable then lots of freeware. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Couldn't find any coverage. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn't appear to have any independent coverage beyond passing mentions.— Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.