Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adsorption operations Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adsorption_operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. as that's how I'm interpreting "delete as rescuable". Star Mississippi 02:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adsorption operations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD to enforce draftification or delete. The article quotes heavily a single source which combines a range of standard surface science topics under a neologism of "adsorption operations". I don't think the originator realized that their source did WP:SYNTH. (As a card-carrying surface scientist I also see some gaps in the science described here.) Since they have already once overridden a draftification it needs to go to AfD for at least draftification. I will leave to the debate whether a delete as not rescuable is appropriate. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as rescuable. We can definitely fix this article, I don't think it's quite article status, but definitely has the potential to be an article after improvement. Ev0308 (talk) 04:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enforce draftification. If the draft expires it can be deleted at that time. Gjs238 (talk) 22:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not seeing much in the way of references for the "Adsorption operations" neologism. The article contradicts itself moving from ions/molecules on surfaces to dust and smoke in the applications section. Summary seems to focus only on (ion-exchange) resin based methods of separation. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.