Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaptability (computer science) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adaptability_(computer_science)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptability (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced dictionary definition for a non-notable context. No useful inbound links. Pnm (talk) 03:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating this page for the same reason:

Adaptivity (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Pnm (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article Adaptation (computer science) gives the context for these two terms. I should have said only one useful inbound link. --Pnm (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Article is a WP:DICDEF without any notability. - Pmedema (talk) 18:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.