Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acumen (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Acumen_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Acumen (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable programming language. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Practically nothing on the web about it. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 17:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unable to establish notability. ~KvnG 00:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)`[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.