Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action on Disability and Development Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Action_on_Disability_and_Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Action on Disability and Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Please see Talk:Action on Disability and Development for a previous discussion around notability and coi that I was not a part of. Doesn't have in-depth coverage or particular significance. Possibly worth a redirect or merge/redirect to Chris Underhill or CAFOD. Boleyn (talk) 09:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.