Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abundance (programming language) (3rd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abundance_(programming_language)_(3rd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No one, even the nominator, is arguing for deletion. Courcelles 00:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abundance (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously nominated by banned user Flylanguage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and I closed the discussion as a contribution by a banned user. Per the discussion here, I am re-nominating it without preference. causa sui (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable enough- Referenced in Byte magazine and used by NASA in some of their software.  snaphat ► 02:52, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; no proponent for its deletion. Prior AFD was WP:POINT; there was no need to reinstate an AFD brought in what is now clearly bad faith. TJRC (talk) 03:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.