Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Graphics Language Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_Graphics_Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to HPGL. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Graphics Language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable programming library (not a programming language). Fails WP:GNG. Tagged for no sources since January 2007. Was only used in a small number of products and only internally. ― Padenton|✉ 16:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 16:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to HPGL. Yes it was a language (it had a grammar), not a library. I also think it lasted into Rocky Mountain Basic (for compatibility reasons) and lasted into the '90s on the HP non-PC micros. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to HPGL Stuartyeates (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to HPGL —Ruud 16:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to HPGL. I don't think a merger of unsourced content is necessary. Andy Dingley has a point, changed my mind. Merge. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What would be the point in pointing one topic to another, where there would then be no content whatsoever to describe that topic? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (nom) Thought I already added this here, but oh well. No objection to merge per above arguments. ― Padenton|✉ 17:14, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.