Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARTAS System Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ARTAS_System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ARTAS System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources are mostly WP:PRIMARY. The one plausible-looking source is the LA Times article, but that's just a rehashed press release.

Particularly egregious is the Edison Award reference. Edison awards are pay-to-play, from the American Marketing Association, whose web page hawks the value of a nomination investment. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I just noticed that one of the primary authors Is an indef blocked sock. RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep this was a solid nomination. Jytdog (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete obvious medical marketing. Jytdog (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. Non notable and fully promotional. Natureium (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.