Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AI for Good Specialization Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AI_for_Good_Specialization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AI for Good Specialization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Looks live an attempt to create a walled garden by the creator of DeepLearning.AI TheLongTone (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Technology, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable. Lewcm Talk to me! 20:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, looks promotional and is (currently) not notable. Artem.G (talk) 16:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep, I have changed the language to make it more neutral. This is from Andrew Ng (one of the most well known AI educators) and Robert Monarch (author of the book "Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning"). It is notable for those reasons, as well as for the number of participants. Caitlyn 191.102.59.2 (talk) 191.102.59.2 (talk) 17:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to improve the article I suggest looking for reliable independent sources discussing the programme, which is what's required by WP:N. Ligaturama (talk) 17:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable, written as an advertisement. Being associated with someone notable as mentioned above isn't enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ligaturama (talk • contribs) 08:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.