Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFR sensor Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AFR_sensor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs work, indeed. Tone 20:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFR sensor

This article has little to offer in terms of quality, verifiable, encyclopedic information. It seems to try to duplicate what is at oxygen sensor. I like to saw logs! (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to oxygen sensor as already proposed on the article page. -- Whpq (talk) 18:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep & Edit needs work, not deletion. DGG (talk) 04:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & Edit, as per DGG. This might warrant deletion if it's either unreferencable, OR or {{copyvio}} (smells like a big cut & paste) but if this thing exists at all, it's sufficiently distinct from oxygen sensor that it shouldn't be merged. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
:Comment - it is a different type of oxygen sensor than is currently in widepsread use is what I gather from the article. If kept a separate article, it would still be appropriate to include a summary in the oxygen sensor article and link to this one as the main article. But in any case, I think we are all in agreement that the content should be kept in one form or another. -- Whpq (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.