Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8th (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/8th_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

8th (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unambiguous promotion of a personal project, no evidence of notability. RonAaron is the main author and editor of this article, and "Ron Aaron" is identified as the designer of the programming language that this article is about. No evidence of notability has been added, nor are any independent sources referenced. Rwessel (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. —Ruud 10:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The same seems to apply to Reva Forth, as well. —Ruud 10:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling turned up nothing useful. Every source I found traced back to ronware.org or aaron-tech.com, Ron Aaron's "Same owner, much better site!" Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. I agree with Ruud re: Reva Forth and just nominated that one to AfD as well. Msnicki (talk) 01:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as I'm not seeing much convincingly better yet. SwisterTwister talk 08:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.