Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1825 Klare Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1825_Klare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1825 Klare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Consensus is for those under 2000 to be discussed and not unilaterally redirected or prodded. Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Along with the usual lightcurve studies [1] [2] [3] it's mentioned frequently in connection with the problem of determining asteroid masses, and there was also a published undergraduate study specifically about this object attempting to model its three-dimensional shape [4]. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw nomination per convincing opinions given abouve. Thanks for taking the time to comment here. Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.