Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1616 Filipoff Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1616_Filipoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 15:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1616 Filipoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect to List of minor planets 1001-2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉   20:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. One lightcurve study [1] isn't enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.