![]() | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
![]() | The following is a draft working towards a proposal for adoption as a Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal must not be taken to represent consensus, but is still in development and under discussion, and has not yet reached the process of gathering consensus for adoption. Thus references or links to this page should not describe it as policy, guideline, nor yet even as a proposal. |
![]() | This page in a nutshell: In general, AI-generated images shouldn't be used in articles not related to AI itself. |
Images generated wholly by AI should generally not be used to illustrate Wikipedia articles. Exceptions to this rule exist when the image is notable in itself or is used officially by a notable individual or organisation, when the article refers to AI art/images and there is consensus that an illustrative image may be useful, and when it is a simple diagram which accurately represents a process. The user adding the image should be expected to provide a rationale for use and seek consensus for the addition on the article talkpage.
Three community discussions in 2025 resulted in a general prohibition on AI image use. Specifically, the discussions held that:
There is clear consensus against using AI-generated imagery to depict BLP subjects. Marginal cases (such as major AI enhancement or where an AI-generated image of a living person is itself notable) can be worked out on a case-by-case basis.[1]
There's general opposition to using AI-generated [medical images], although there might be greater room for exceptions [than with BLP images], especially for very simple images.[2]
Subject to common sense and with a number of exceptions, most images wholly generated by AI should not be used on [the English-language Wikipedia]. Obvious exceptions include articles about AI, and articles about notable AI-generated images. ... The community objects particularly strongly to AI-generated images (1) of named people, and (2) in technical or scientific subjects such as anatomy and chemistry.[3]
For the purposes of this guideline, an "AI-generated image" is
This guideline applies even when the image is the only image available of the subject, and even when the image has no immediately obvious flaws.
AI-generated images may be appropriate – and can be decided on on a case-by-case basis – when one or several of the following is true:
Absent explicit consensus, AI-generated images may never be used to depict the following: