User talk:Loebner Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Loebner

You added external links here. That falls under the definition of Wikipedia:Spam and Wikipedia:External links.

First you need to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Here are some of the problems with your version of the article. You called yourself "mavrick" but in some cases that can be seen as derogatory and, unsourced, would violate Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Find a quote frome somebody who has called you that. You say that you hold 6 patents but your own website list only 5. Your version says that you wrote a Manifesto of Sexual Freedom but again your site says that it's called the Magna Carta for Sex Work. In the context of the article the word "judges" should not have a capital, years when standing alone are not linked and dates such as March 26 1942 don't have a comma between 26 and 1942.

There are other problems but we don't need to go through all of them now. As I said read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, follow the guidelines there, and lets try and work together on this. However, beacause of the problems I mentioned above I have restored the cleaned version. But, as per you comments on my talk page I have included that Crown is the major sponser and the alternate name for the Magna Carta.

Why don't you provide a picture? The article like most could do with one. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the reference from Dennis Duggan is not available on the Internet it would still be usable if a magazine like Atlantic Monthly had used it. If you have a copy then all you need to do is say what issue it is. The thing is that while your article shouldn't be a whitewash, neither should it turn into a open forum for attacks on you. The idea of "Biographies of living persons" policy is to err on the side of caution. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]