User talk:DBigUVrays Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DBigUVrays

DBigUVrays, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DBigUVrays! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is too similar to an existing username. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 08:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

To reviewing admin: please do not unblock without contacting me. Bishonen | tålk 08:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: This is unfair Bishonen that you directly block my account without any warnings or even a basic welcome message and further even not allowing other admins to unblock me. I am posting another unblock request this time with an appeal for different username please accept it.DBigUVrays (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DBigUVrays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedians, Hope you all are doing fine by contributing to this free enclyopedia, recently Bishonen blocked me for having a similar username to an existing user but it's not the case as I choose this username after a deep research. However, I agree that a user exist a year back with this username who stopped editing due to other issues. Therefore, It's my humble request to review my block again as there is a difference between DBigXray and DBigUVrays. I can't see any problem with this username. Anyway If username is actually main reason for my block then please let me know I will address the issue and apply for a new username. Thanks DBigUVrays (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I did a little digging and I don't for one second believe your name is a coincidence or an accident. This is a good block. I reiterate what Bishonen said that any admin considering an unblock needs to contact her first. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DBigUVrays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wiki community again, my unblock request is again turned down by a admin without giving a proper reason. Anyway as far as I can see major problem with my account is my username therefore I request to please change my username from DBigUVrays to AnonymousWikiEditor. Please do it soon and let me make positive contributions. Thanks.DBigUVrays (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're a sock puppet of User:Showbiz826. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

'AnonymousWikiEditor' is taken. You'll need to choose a username that isn't in use. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie: Ok Sir then please change it to Old School_Rebeliion. Thanks DBigUVrays (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Seriously ???? Can you point out just one special diff. which matches with these sock master ??? Even one ??? Further as far as I can see this sock edits through mobile devices which I found very hard to do as almost all of my edits are through a PC. We have completely different editing habites, IP adress etc. If you don't want to unblock me then Please don't but accusing me being a sock is just not on. DBigUVrays (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

You're a troll, and we're not going to waste time arguing with confirmed socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]