This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
For some reason, three of the symbols' links were piped to various disambiguation pages, instead of linking to the emoji itself. In this template, it is preferable to link to the symbol's page; see WP:NOTBROKEN. -IagoQnsi (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When intentionally linking to a disambiguation page (which all three of those emoji redirect to), piping that link through the (disambiguation) redirect is mandated by the WP:INTDABLINK policy. Also note the line at the guideline you cited, under "Reasons not to bypass redirects include:" Intentional links to disambiguation pages always use the title with "(disambiguation)", even if that is a redirect. -NiceguyedcGo Huskies!09:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]