Template talk:Source check Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Source_check

Template:Source check is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books: Reference works This template is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. For guidelines on this template's usage, see its documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook This template is supported by the Reference works task force.

Archives

Archive 1

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace all mentions of tools.wmflabs.org/iabot with iabot.wmcloud.org. Harej (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Also on dawiki and urwiki. -- GreenC 20:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I noticed that GreenC's latest edit was missing the update date. Even if it's a small link fix, the "last update" should be changed if editors make any changes to it.

Also, make the deprecation message if possible, as the long message makes the template slightly larger than the versions before IABot's talk page posts were disabled. Ijoe2003 (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to change because it is used on nearly 1 million pages, I don't think changing the update date is necessary for that previous URL change. Also the some people have strong opinions like it should be collapsed by default, or not by default. Anyway I don't want to get involved with this many pages. But I'll leave the edit request open in case anyone else wants. -- GreenC 01:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: It is unclear why this template has a "last update" note. I did not see an explanation of that text on this page (added in 2018). I read the linked discussion, which I did not find illuminating regarding the "last update" note.

I think the note could simply be removed, or at least changed only when there is a substantive change to the template. The most recent edit changed a link, not anything substantive regarding the meaning or content of the template, so I wouldn't consider that an update. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we mention that in editnotice? Ijoe2003 (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi, can somebody please remove /iabot from the URLs as it was accidentally not removed in response to one of the above edit requests, causing them to break.

They should both be like [https://iabot.wmcloud.org/index.php?page=[…].

Thanks! --Nintendofan885^{T&Cs apply} 15:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed – Good Catch! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good 102.218.50.99 (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]