Template talk:Service management in Unix Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Service_management_in_Unix

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Computing This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Are they portable, really? Not to say I object against their inclusion to the navbox at all, but they are permitted into |list1= only if they are portable. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Service Management Facility is, it just has an awkward license, so nobody wants it. Should I create a new category for SystemStarter? --Ismael Luceno (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, systemd is not portable --Ismael Luceno (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

upstart seems to not be portable (depends on inotify, epoll, eventfd, signalfd, timerfd, ptrace, and netlink (for udev and proc)). --Ismael Luceno (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a branch of upstart for kFreeBSD. Not sure about it's status... --Ismael Luceno (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that launchd should be moved to the Mac OS X-specific section. It has been ported to FreeBSD, kinda--it can't run as PID 1, and is extremely experimental, and has basically one person working on it. I wouldn't call that portable. ~ LukeShu (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Totally makes sense, got it moved to the OS X section. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 07:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]