Template talk:Recently revised Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Recently_revised

Please be aware that editors are not always patrolling pages. Keeping an eye on Category:Recently revised would be helpful for those who want to get involved.

This template was considered for deletion on 8 September 2023. The result of the discussion was "keep".

Would a link to the talk page be a sound idea, as the template requests review? PoptartKing 20:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a very sound idea. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 09:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template should have a talk page link, urging an explanation on:

• What was the "rewrite" about? How was the article before, and what is it now?
• What needs attention? Citations missing? Spelling? Writing style and sentences? Facts?

This template should also, when used, ASAP be replaced with something more specific. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 09:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this go on the talk page since it's not a clean-up or content-issue template? -Rocket000 20:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it is completely irrelevant to the reader that the article happens to have been revised recently, this template is distracting from the actual article, and it is not a cleanup template. I boldly added a note that this template should only be added to the talk page. Melsaran (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm undoing this. It's in the style of article cleanup templates, and it conveys much the same sense as the under construction tag. Chris Cunningham (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please add an Autohide function so that the template will automatically hide/remove itself after ≈1 month? After about a year or so it's not really "recent" anymore. Thanks.--98.114.243.75 (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The template adds pages to the categories under category:recently revised, which should be patrolled. That's a better solution that auto-hiding the tag, which can lead to half-finished pages being neglected. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please add a date parameter to this template, which would be visible on the article page? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@GoingBatty: In retrospect this has finally been done. =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]