You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this page:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Additional information:
/
This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
ElijahPepe, I don't think it is an improvement to simply copypaste the format at Template:Russian invasion of Ukraine into here. It is not necessarily the ideal format for other conflicts, and we had one section of this template with two articles and another with four. We should use sections when not doing so renders the navbox way too long to be read easily; with sections of two and four articles we're not there yet. Your edits also left a lot of empty space in general in the template. I am not opposed to adding back some of the links you had added. And personally I disagree with not listing casualties, but I'd like to hear other editors' opinion on this too. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lau737, please stop adding these unrelated links to the template. This template is for the Israel–Hamas war. Not for general judicial terms that apply to dozens of past and current military conflicts and not only. We can't include anything slightly related to everywhere. These links also provide no informational value. Many of them don't even discuss this conflict. It's just clutter. We already have articles of this kind specifically about this war or about the wider Israeli-Palestinian conflict. SuperΨDro12:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No you don't, otherwise I would have added these to Israeli-Palestinian conflict template. When people talk about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, all they talk about is "Ethnic conflict," "Ethnic cleansing," "Social cleansing," "Structural violence" this and inhumane blockade that. When the Palestinians talk about it, all these things are true, up to and including genocide. The terms must be included! Lau737 (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ethnic conflict and Ethnic violence were there for flair, the same being true for Communal violence. Extrajudicial killing, Ethnic cleansing, Social cleansing, Population cleansing, Collective punishment, Political cleansing of population weren't there for flair, they were important terms that shouldn't be excluded.
"Social cleansing" just follows from the accusations of genocide. "Population cleansing" follows from accusations of bullying Palestinians off the land. "Political cleansing of population" follows from attempts to move Palestinians who are members of Hamas off the land.
As I said not anything even distantly related to the conflict has to be on the template. Earth is also distantly related and it shouldn't be included. All of those general articles are either discussed in other pages on the template or have specific Israeli-Palestinian conflict pages of their own. My edits were thanked by two other editors. One of those reverted your reverts of me. I don't see consensus for inclusion of these terms in the template. Because it's not necessary. SuperΨDro14:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And why did "Killing of journalists in the Israel–Hamas war" have to go? Did your finger slip?
I am not about to link every article from "War" to "Missile," but yes, the most straightforward articles, articles that would otherwise be overlooked, should be included.
Have you read any of the articles? This is just as unreasonable as barring "Lynching" from the Civil rights movement template, or "Rape" from the Genocide template. Lau737 (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop speaking like this, you've already been warned for your tone by several other users [1]. Yes, my finger "slipped", I accidentally removed that list, apologies for that. Look, it is clear we disagree on this. I advise you to seek dispute resolution measures. You can use WP:RfC, WP:3O, or other methods mentioned at WP:DISPUTE, I will participate on them. I think the burden is on you as you're the one proposing a change and because my reverts of those changes have been supported by two other editors. And genocide is a construct, it makes perfect sense that it is full of theorical concepts and definitions. You don't see lists of general definitions on events. At least I don't on Template:Civil rights movement. Lynching in particular started precisely on the US, at least the term, so it is justified as I see it that it is included. None of the terms you mentioned started with this conflict. I don't see any particular reason for including these general terms that apply to many conflicts in the template of this one. SuperΨDro17:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Add Talal Abu Zarifa to the deceased Other militants section and Mahmoud Khalil Zakzuk to deceased Hamas militants section, and David Ben-Avraham, Hani Al-Masdar and Fathi Ghaben to deceased Palestinian civilians. MF4412 (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After further consideration, I am not going to perform this edit. Another editor is welcome to handle these requests, but in my opinion this infobox is overburdened as it is and badly needs to be condensed and/or split. I will post a discussion suggesting this when I get a moment. It is already longer than most stubs and bigger than the majority of articles at almost 16.8 kilobytes in size; for context the largest article in the list above is 16.2 kilobytes. AdamBlacktalk • contribs08:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since this has grown excessively long, and multiple editors have expressed a reluctance to add more links to it, I suggest we create child navboxes about more specific aspects, and then have this be a more general navbox for links to the core articles. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. Listing killed civilians of a war on its navbox is unorthodox in Wikipedia. I'd favor taking this information into a list article or into a separate navbox. The rest I think is quite okay. I suggest the model of Template:Russian invasion of Ukraine. It's a gigantic template but it is divided into subgroups making its navigation easier for readers despite its size. I think it is desirable to keep all articles into one navbox if possible. The killed civilians could also be kept with this model, as the mass killing of civilians is an important aspect of this war. But I ultimately don't have too strong of an opinion on what should be done with the template. SuperΨDro23:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 January 2025