Template talk:AfC submission/rejected Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:AfC_submission/rejected

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

@ G13 CHECK
-{{#ifexpr: {{#time: U | {{{revisionts|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}}}} +6 months }} < {{#time: U}}|<div style="text-align: center; background-color: #FCC; border: 1px solid #FAA; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;">This draft has not been edited in over six months and thus qualifies to be deleted per [[WP:G13|CSD G13]].</div>{{#if:{{{demo|}}}||[[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}]]}}}}
+{{#ifexpr: {{#time: U | {{{revisionts|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}}}} +6 months}} < {{#time: U}}|<div style="text-align: center; background-color: #FCC; border: 1px solid #FAA; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;">This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per [[WP:G13|CSD G13]].</div>{{#if:{{{demo|}}}||[[Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}]][[Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned drafts or AfC submissions|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}]]}}}}

Summary: Automatically add draft to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as abandoned drafts or AfC submissions after six months as originally intended. Also, change wording to match Template:AFC submission. ~riley (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. @~riley:, the page is only semi-protected, so you should be able to make the change yourself. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Deacon Vorbis: Sorry, Deacon. I did not check this one, all the others are protected. ~riley (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just realized that as well. I wonder if that's an oversight. Oh well. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deacon Vorbis, it was indeed an oversight! Good catch. The templates have been protected. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add to this template "Please do not resubmit this draft without first consulting an administrator or the help desk of articles for creation. Doing so may result in this draft being nominated for deletion and/or protected." Rationale: In this page's current form, it does not make that clear (aside from an ambiguous "STOP" sign) and can result in something like this if left unchecked. Aasim (talk) 04:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: Administrators have no extra power in content decisions, an the AfC process is not mandatory, so I'm opposed to that provision. I suggest establishing a consensus at the AfC talk page for a new wording and then reopening this TPER. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Make the background color darker to differentiate it from Template:AfC submission/declined? Just a suggestion

casualdejekyll 13:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: this has been discussed a few times now and there has not been any consensus regarding if the colours should be the same or different (and what, if anything, the "other colour" would be). Primefac (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the line

| url = {{fullurl:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk|action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_submission/declined/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}}

to

| url = {{fullurl:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question|withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}}

This switches from using a preloaded template to a Javascript gadget. Relevant discussion can be found at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#AFC_HD_Preload_templates. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Primefac (talk) 08:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions from this template. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_11#Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions from over a year ago. Awesome Aasim 17:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: You nominated a WikiProject-specific category without notifying the WikiProject, with a half-dozen discussions about the template at the WikiProject describing how and why it is used. Primefac (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would kindly ask LaundryPizza03 to revert their close and at the very least relist the discussion and notify WT:AFC so that a better discussion can occur. Primefac (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac and Awesome Aasim: Appealed to WP:DRV. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Primefac (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]