Talk:The Algorithm Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Algorithm

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

That's a dublicate entry of the obvious kind. I just don't get it: If you know there already is an article on The Algorithm, which is quite probably the case if you need to extend your article's name by "(band)", then why do you start the redundand article at all? And how come this is overlooked in the AfC process? --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold, it really is obvious, I don't see why you thought a discussion of the merge was necessary. Mike.BRZ (talk) 05:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first, I had been a bit too bold at another occasion just before. Second, the article The Algorithm (band) appears to be not just an accidentally created dublicate, but a direct copy started only a few hours later and paraphrased just enough to not be dedected. And there even is a third copy created the same day. So I don't think you could find any useful info in one of the articles but not the other one. It's not even worth keeping it as a redirect. Anyways, I'm going to give it a try. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]